The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed Writ Petition No. 41886 of 2002 as infructuous, holding that nothing survived regarding the relief sought concerning a quashing petition from 2002.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P.No.41886 OF 2002
R.Maheswaran
Vice President,
Pannimadai Village Panchayat,
Periyanaickenpalayam Union,
Coimbatore District. ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Coimbatore District,
Coimbatore-18.
2. The Assistant Director of Rural Development,
Coimbatore-18.
3. The Block Development Officer,
Periyanaickenpalayam Union,
Coimbatore – 17.
4. The Presedent of
Pannimadai Village Panchayat,
Pannimadai Post,
Coimbatore – 17.
5. T.M.Rajendran,
Member 5 th Ward,
Pannimadai Village Panchayat,
Pannimadai Post,
Coimbatore – 17. ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 10.10.2002 made in Mu.Mu.No.6265/02/A3 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same.
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous and nothing survives in so far as the prayer sought.
R. Maheswaran
The District Collector, Coimbatore District
The Assistant Director of Rural Development, Coimbatore
The Block Development Officer
The President of Pannimadai Village Panchayat
T.M. Rajendran
Dr. Anita Sumanth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
