Disposed

Arulmighu Kottaimariamman v. The Commissioner

Madras HC3 Jan 2017WP/7/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Order disposing of a writ petition under Article 226 regarding encroachments on temple land. The court accepted respondents' assurance to act under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act within three months and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition stood disposed of on the assurance of taking action under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act within three months.

Arulmighu Kottaimariamman Vs The Commissioner — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 03.01.2017

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶5

W.P.No.7 of 2017

¶6

Arulmighu Kottaimariamman Thirukoil, Rep. By its Hereditary Trustee, R.Ramakrishnan. ... Petitioner

¶7

-Vs1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Dept., 119, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034.

¶8

The District Collector, Salem District, Salem 636 001.

¶9

The Sub Collector, Mettur, Salem District.

¶10

The Tahsildar, Omalur Taluk, Salem District.

¶11

The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Salem 636 001.

¶12

The Superintendent of Police, Salem 636 001. ... Respondents

¶13

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to remove the encroachments in Survey No.143/1, 143/2 Omalur Village, Salem District and hand over the same to petitioner temple within the time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Surya Narayanan
For Respondents : Mr.M.Maharaj
Special Government Pleader
for RR 1 and 5
: Mr.R.Vijayakumar
Additional Government Pleader
for RR 2 to 4
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Learned Additional Government Pleader states that since
notices have been served under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land
Encroachment Act, 1905, action in pursuance thereto in
accordance with law will be taken and concluded within a maximum
period of three (3) months from today.
2.The aforesaid statement is taken on record and the third
and fourth respondents will remain bound by the same.
3.Writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sra
To
1. The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments
Dept., 119, Nungambakkam High Road,
Chennai 600 034.
2. The District Collector,
Salem District, Salem 636 001.
3. The Sub Collector,
Mettur, Salem District.
4. The Tahsildar,
Omalur Taluk, Salem District.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Salem 636 001.

¶18

The Superintendent of Police, Salem 636 001.

¶19

+1cc to Mr.Surya Narayanan, Advocate, S.R.No.295 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.788

¶20

W.P.No.7 of 2017
MG(CO)
CA(10/01/2017)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Arulmighu Kottaimariamman v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arulmighu Kottaimariamman v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Ramadoss, Vs The District Collector

Mrs. v.Syed Ali Fathima, Vs The State of Tamilnadu

M/s.Tgi Packaging Private Vs State of Tamil Nadu

M.Govindaswamy, Vs the District Collector

M.Sakthivel, Vs the District Collector

P.Nagarajam Vs Rajeev Ranjan IAS