T.Ramadoss, v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed writ seeking removal of encroachment on a canal. The court recorded that respondents had no current proposal to install poles, citing the petitioner's loss to the Kanal Board.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.01.2017
CORAM :
The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P. No.14646 of 2015
T.Ramadoss .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The District Collector,
Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.
2.The Assistant Executive Engineer,
Public Works Department,
Water Resources Department,
Kollidam Basin Sub Division,
Chidambaram.
3.The Block Development Officer,
(Village Panchayats), Kumaratchi
Panchayat Union, Kumaratchi,
Chidambaram Taluk,
Cuddalore District.
4.The Tahsildar,
Chidambaram Taluk,
Cuddalore District.
5.The Village Panchayat President,
Sivayam Village Panchayat,
Chidambaram Taluk,
Cuddalore District.
6.The Inspector of Police,
Taluk Police Station,
Chidambaram Taluk,
Cuddalore District. .. Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 6 to remove the encroachment on Chandran Voikkal (Candran Canal) comprised in Survey No.16, situate in Sivayam Village, Chidambaram Taluk, Cuddalore District and to restore the canal in its original form forthwith.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct respondents to remove encroachment on Chandran Voikkal canal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T. Ramadoss
- respondent
District Collector, Cuddalore District
- respondent
Assistant Executive Engineer
- respondent
Block Development Officer
- respondent
Tahsildar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court