The High Court at Madras disposed of W.P.No.19918 of 2004 filed by V.Arumugham seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct State authorities to constitute a peace committee per an SHRC order. The Court dismissed the petition as having become infructuous based on counsel's endorsement.
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 18.08.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.No.19918 of 2004
V.Arumugham .. Petitioner
Vs
1. The District Collector,
Office of the Collectorate,
Tiruvannamalai.
2. The District Suprintendent of Police,
Tiruvannamalai.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Tiruvannamalai District.
4. The Tashildar,
Taluk Office, Polur Taluk,
Tiruvannamalai District.
5. The Inspector of Police,
Kadaladi Police Station,
Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.
6. The Sub-Inspector of Police,
Kadaladi Police Station,
Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.
7. V.Pachai Muthu
8. V.Saravanan
9. G.Kathirvel
10.G.Mani
11.G.Kannan
12.K.Vijayan
13.K.Sankar
.... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 6 to take necessary action as per the order passed by the State Human Rights Commission Tamil Nadu in S.H.R.C.No.4730 of 2003/STJ dated 05.08.2003 by constituting a peace committee among the petitioner and the respondents 7 to
13 and their family members for having permanent solution from them to put an end to the dispute prevailed among them at Mel Sivwallore Village, Kattavaram Palayam Post, Tiruvannamalai District and to submit a report to that effect with in a time bound manner.
For Petitioner : M/s.L.Karthika
for Mr.C.Prakasam
For Respondents : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali
Government Advocate (for RR-1 to 6)
:Mr.S.Kumaradevan (for RR-7 to 13)
O R D E R
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as
having become infructuous. No costs.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-V)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
sji
To
1. The District Collector,
Office of the Collectorate,
Tiruvannamalai.
2. The District Suprintendent of Police,
Tiruvannamalai.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Tiruvannamalai District.
4. The Tashildar,
Taluk Office, Polur Taluk,
Tiruvannamalai District.
5. The Inspector of Police,
Kadaladi Police Station,
Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.
W.P.No.19918 of 2004
SP(12/09/2017)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Article 226 praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.Arumugham
The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate, Tiruvannamalai
The District Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvannamalai District
The Tashildar, Taluk Office, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District
The Inspector of Police, Kadaladi Police Station, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District
S.Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
