Annamalai v. the Executive Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
null
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.08.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.Nos.14423, 14768 & 14769 of 2004 & W.M.P.Nos.17067, 17516 & 17517 of 2004
Annamalai ... Petitioner in all WPs Vs The Executive Officer, Gingee Town Panchayat, Gingee Town. ... Respondent in all WPs
PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to notice dated 12.06.2003 bearing Nos.04651 to 04653 respectively on the file of the respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran
For Respondent : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, Government Advocate C O M M O N O R D E R
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, these writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Annamalai
- respondent
The Executive Officer, Gingee Town Panchayat, Gingee Town
Coram
S.Vaidyanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court