T.Sornalatha, v. the Director
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged a transfer order on grounds of surplus. The court noted the petitioner had already continued in service for five years since filing the writ. No further adjudication on merits was held.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition stands closed. No orders as to costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :14.11.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.19917 of 2012
and
M.P.No.1 of 2012
T.Sornalatha ..Petitioner vs 1.The Director, Directorate of School Education, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2.The Joint Director, Directorate of School Education, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015. .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent relating to order dated 16th July 2012 in proceedings Na.Ka.No:63128/C3/E1/2009 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Raghavan
For Respondent : Mr.A.Rajaperumal Additional Government Pleader
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further adjudication was required regarding the transfer of the writ petitioner on ground of surplus.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T. Sornalatha
- respondent
The Director, Directorate of School Education
- respondent
The Joint Director, Directorate of School Education
- respondent
The Chief Educational Officer
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court