The General Manager, v. P.M.Kannappan
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition challenging an impugned notice was dismissed as having become infructuous after the respondent passed a final order. No relief is granted.
The writ petition challenging an impugned notice was dismissed as having become infructuous after the respondent passed a final order. No relief is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.02.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.No.18756 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013
The General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., Dharmapuri Region, Dharmapuri. ...Petitioner Versus
1.P.M.Kannappan
Prop. S.A.M.S. Bus Service
Prayers: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent made in R.No.A3/68984/2012 dated 18.03.2013 & quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to dispose the 1st respondent application dated 30.11.2012 for grant of “Renewal of Permit” as per the procedures enjoined for “Grant of Stage Carriage Permit” under Section 71, 72 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988 and the allied Tamilnadu Motor Vehicles Rules 1989 & taking consideration of Section 7 & 10 of the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicle (Special) Provisions Act 1992 (41/92), for the disposal of the Renewal application of the 1st respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Paramasiva Doss
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is challenging the impugned notice issued by the 2nd respondent. Pursuant to the said notice, the respondent has passed the final orders on 26.05.2013. Hence, the prayer in the Writ Petition has become https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ infructuous.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pvs
To
1. The Regional Transport Authority,
Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.
2. The Presiding Officer,
State Transport Appellate Tribunal,
High Court Campus, Chennai – 104.
+1cc to Mr.M. Palani, Advocate, S.R.No.9765
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.10206
NRI(CO)
EU 1.03.17
W.P.No.18756 of 2013
& M.P.No.1 of 2013
The General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., Dharmapuri Region, Dharmapuri
The Regional Transport Authority, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri
The Presiding Officer, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, High Court Campus, Chennai
D. KRISHNAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court