Writ petition challenging proceedings of a respondent was dismissed as infructuous by the High Court of Judicature at Madras after the petitioner accepted the subject matter was no longer actionable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
W.P.NO.17556 OF 2003
Tiruvadanai Panchayat Union
Represented by its President
Goodluck S.Rajendran
Tiruvadanai,
Ramanathapuram District. ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector
Ramanathapuram District
Collectorate,
Ramanathapuram.
2.T.Thyagarajan
3.V.Malayandi ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India with a prayer to issue a Writ of
Certiorari, to call for the records of the 1 st respondent
relating to his proceedings in Na.Ka.A4/8102/2003 dated
04.03.2003 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Yasar Arafath
for Mr.K.Govi Ganesan
For Respondent-1 : Mr.V.Subbarayan
Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.K.Yasar Arafath (Enrl.No.2579/2016) learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
sd/
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
TK
To
The District Collector
Ramanathapuram District
Collectorate,
Ramanathapuram.
W.P.NO.17556 OF 2003
PPA(CO)
GN(27/01/2017)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tiruvadanai Panchayat Union
District Collector
T.Thyagarajan
V.Malayandi
P.N. Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
