Challenging proposal to open TASMAC shop within specific distance from State Highway. Court found petition infructuous as shop not proposed to be opened.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.07.2017
CORAM
The HON'BLE MS.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.No.16139 of 2017
R.Babu ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
2. The Managing Director,
TASMAC Limited,
Chennai – 600 008.
3. The Manager,
TASMAC,
Kancheepuram District. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus
forbearing the respondents from opening Shop No.4527 in
Kancheepuram District in State Highway as per the directions of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Premkumar For Respondents : Mr.M.K.Subramanian Government Pleader for 1st respondent Mr.B.Nedunchezhian for respondent Nos.2 & 3 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
This writ petition relates to the proposal to open TASMAC shop No.4527 in Kancheepuram District.
2 and 3, it is stated that the petitioner has given an incorrect shop number. The correct shop number should have been 4524.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar bbr To: 1. The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. 2. The Managing Director, TASMAC Limited, Chennai – 600 008. 3. The Manager, TASMAC, Kancheepuram District.
+1cc to Mr.B.Nedunchezhian, Advocate, S.R.No.46151 +1cc to Mr.V.Premkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.46344 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.46220
W.P.No.16139 of 2017 CS V CA(13/07/2017)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the proposed opening of a TASMAC shop under Supreme Court orders is maintainable.
Whether the writ petition praying for restraining the respondents from opening the shop is maintainable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Civil Appeal Nos.12164-12166 of 2016Referred¶3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Babu
The District Collector, Kancheepuram District
The Managing Director, TASMAC Limited
The Manager, TASMAC
Indira Banerjee
M. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
