Disposed

R.Arunkumar v. The Assistant Engineer

Madras HC11 Dec 2017WP/15030/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner opposed the demolition of a culvert/bridge and removal of a sewage line for road construction. The Court accepted the respondents' undertaking to construct without hindrance and repair any damage, thereby disposing of the petition by recording the undertaking.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of by recording the undertaking given by the respondents. The respondents were directed to complete the work within three weeks.

R.Arunkumar Vs The Assistant Engineer — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11.12.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶6

W.P.No.15030 of 2017
and
W.M.P.No.16269 of 2017
R.Arunkumar ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The Assistant Engineer,
Highways Department (Construction and
Maintenance),
Chennai.
2.The Special Tahsildar (LA) Highways,
(Mambalam-Guindy Taluk),
Collector Office,
Singaravelar Maligai,
Rajaji Salai,
Chennai 600 001. ...Respondents

¶7

Prayer:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of mandamus to forbear the respondents from in any manner interfering with the petitioner's use and enjoyment of the property situate at No.40 and 41, Velacherry Tambaram Main Road, Vijayanagar, Velacherry Chennai 600 042 by demolishing the culvert/bridge or removing the sewage line.

¶8

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶9

For Petitioner : M/s.Vasudha Thiagarajan for Mr.R.Thiagarajan For Respondents : Mr.R.Govindasamy Special Government Pleader

¶10

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The petitioner seeks for a mandamus forbearing the respondents

¶13

from in any manner interfering with the petitioner's use and enjoyment of

¶14

the property situate at No.40 and 41, Velacherry Tambaram Main Road, Vijayanagar, Velacherry Chennai 600 042, by demolishing the culvert/bridge

¶15

or removing the sewage line.

¶16

2.The respondents filed counter affidavit.

¶17

3.It is seen that while constructing an over bridge at Velacherry-

¶18

Vijayanagaram junction connecting intersection of Taramani Road, Tambaram-Velachery Road and Velachery Bypass Road, a service road is also

¶19

being laid by the respondents and the petitioner is aggrieved only in respect of removing a culvert for the purpose of laying the service road, which

¶20

according to the petitioner, causes interference to the petitioner's property.

¶21

4.In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it is made clear

¶22

that the respondents would construct a grade separator and lay the service road without hindrance to the private property to the petitioner. Learned

¶23

Special Government Pleader for the respondents, apart from the above

¶24

http://www.judis.nic.in undertaking given in the counter affidavit, further stated that even in

¶25

respect of the sewage line, already put up by the petitioner, the

¶26

¶27

respondents will take all measures to save the line and in case any damage caused to the said line, it will be repaired at the cost of the respondents themselves thereby not leaving the petitioner to meet any loss or damages to his property.

¶28

5.As the above undertaking given by the respondents would take care of the interest of the petitioner, this Court is of the view that the writ petition can be closed by recording the above said undertaking given by the respondents. Thus, the writ petition is disposed of, by recording the above undertaking given by the respondents. The respondents will also consider the request of the petitioner to complete the work at the earliest, at any event, within a period of three weeks. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶29

11.12.2017

¶30

Speaking/Non Speaking Index : Yes / No vri

¶31

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶32

¶33

K.RAVICHADNRABAABU,J.

¶34

vri

¶35

¶36

1.The Assistant Engineer,
Highways Department (Construction and
Maintenance),
Chennai.
2.The Special Tahsildar (LA) Highways,
(Mambalam-Guindy Taluk),
Collector Office,
Singaravelar Maligai,
Rajaji Salai,
Chennai 600 001.
W.P.No.15030 of 2017
11.12.2017

¶37

http://www.judis.nic.in

R.Arunkumar v. The Assistant Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Arunkumar v. The Assistant Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Devendiran Vs The District Collector

P.Raman, Vs The Inspector of Police

G.Manoharan Vs Revision Authority/ The

M/s.Sri Mathi Sago Factory Vs The District Designated

Rajesh Muthuraman Vs The Regional Passport

G.Vivekanandan, Vs The Chairman Hill Areas