Disposed

G.Manoharan v. Revision Authority/ The

Madras HC8 Dec 2017WP/31823/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging an order in patta proceedings. The court found a dispute exists regarding property title between the petitioner and the second respondent, with a civil suit pending. The writ petition was disposed of after granting liberty to the petitioner to seek corrections in revenue records upon success in the civil suit.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach Revenue officials for corrections in revenue records if successful in the pending civil suit.

G.Manoharan Vs Revision Authority/ The — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 08.12.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶5

W.P.No.31823 of 2017

¶6

and

¶7

W.M.P.No.34969 of 2017

¶8

G.Manoharan ..Petitioner

¶9

vs. 1. The Revisional Authority/

¶10

The District Revenue Officer, Office of Collectorate, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District. 2. K.Rathina Mudaliar ... Respondents

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings vide RC.No.26698/2016(B3) dated 11.09.2017 passed by the 1^st respondent and t quash the same and direct the 1^st respondent to restore the revenue records to the original position as on the date of filing of the suit in O.S.No.59 of 2016, namely in the name of Mr.G.Manoharan, S/o Ganapathy Mudaliar to await for the verdict of Civil Court.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Manohar

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.K.J.Sivakumar,

¶14

Government Advocate for R1

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

Mr.K.J.Sivakumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the first respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶17

The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the first respondent arising out of a patta proceedings.

¶18

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

It is seen that there is a dispute with regard to the title to the property between the petitioner and the second respondent. It is also seen that the petitioner has also approached the Civil Court and filed O.S.No.59 of 2016 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruttani, seeking for declaration and for other relief wherein the second respondent herein was arrayed as the first defendant and the other Revenue officials including the first respondent and the Electricity Board officials were arrayed as party defendants. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to agitate the matter before the Civil Court where the Suit is filed. If, in the meantime, any entry or correction is made in the patta, needless to say, that everything is subject to the result of the Suit, which is pending before the Civil Court.

¶21

Therefore, I find that the present writ petition need not be kept pending as it is open to the petitioner to approach the Revenue officials and seek for necessary correction or entry in the revenue records in the event of his success in the Suit. By granting such liberty, this Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-J) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi To The Revision Authority/ The District Revenue Officer, Office of Collectorate, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District. +1cc to Mr.V.MANOHAR Advocate, S.R.No. 87597 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 88152 W.P.No.31823 of 2017

¶23

TR(19/12/2017)

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Manoharan v. Revision Authority/ The

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Manoharan v. Revision Authority/ The

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sakthivel Vs K.Jayaprakash

S.Bharath Kumar Vs Dharmendra Pratap Yadav IAS

Nithyaesh Natraj Vs The Central Information

D.Devendiran Vs The District Collector

P.Raman, Vs The Inspector of Police

P.Kusela Kumar, Vs The Tahsildar