Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to prevent the respondent from demolishing his building. The petition was subsequently declared infructuous by the court.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.01.2017
CORAM :
The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.No.14373 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 P.Jayaraman ... Petitioner -VsThe Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, Tiruvallur Division, Tiruvallur. ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondent from demolishing the petitioner's building bearing Door No.2/159 situated in S.No.226, Padavattamman Koil Street, Sembarambakkam, Poonamallee Taluk, Tiruvallur District.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Writ petition is, thus, dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2015 is also dismissed.
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sra
To
The Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, Tiruvallur Division, Tiruvallur.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.127
W.P.No.14373 of 2015
NRJK(CO)
CA(11/01/2017)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Jayaraman
The Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, Tiruvallur Division, Tiruvallur
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
M.SUNDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
