Petitioners sought mandatory writ to restore payment of medical allowance to cane officers. Petition was withdrawn by counsel before disposal by the High Court of Judicature at Madras.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
W.P.NO.11153 OF 2009
1.S.Rengaraj 2.S.Sethusubramaniam 3.A.Boopathiraja 4.D.Gurumoorthy 5.C.Senthil kumar 6.M.Thaiyammal 7.J.Indrajeth ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary to Government Industries Department Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Commissioner of Sugar 474, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by with a prayer to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to revert to the position as was prevalent earlier, namely, of paying all the cane officers including Mills site cane officers medical allowance at the rate of one month's salary, per year, from the dated of circular dated 02.12.2004 along with arrears to each petitioner to till date.
2
P.N.PRAKASH, J.
TK
For Petitioners : Ms.Usha Ramman For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court
to withdraw the writ petition and he has circulated a letter dated 06.01.2017
to the Registry in this regard. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
10.01.2017
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TK
To
2.The Commissioner of Sugar 474, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035.
W.P.NO.11153 OF 2009
3
S. Rengaraj and Others
State of Tamil Nadu
Commissioner of Sugar
P.N. Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
