Parvathipuram Udamootu Dharmam v. J.Spurgeon Samuel
Case brief
What is this about?
Review applicant sought leave to review an order refusing to file a writ petition for land title. Court discharged from proceeding after respondent Tahsildar passed a final order, making further review unnecessary.
What did the court decide?
Review Application closed as the second respondent passed a final order.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.06.2017 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.M.P(MD)No.1810 of 2017 and Rev.Appl(MD)SR.No.6033 of 2017
Parvathipuram Udamoottu Dharmam of Arulmighu Subramaniaswamy Temple, Tiruchendur, Rep by its Takkar, Executive Officer/Joint Commissioner of Arulmighu Subramaniswamy Temple, Tiruchendur.
... Petitioner Vs.
1.J.Spurgeon Samuel
2.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari.
3.The Tahsildar, Agasteeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents
This Review Application filed under Section 226 of Constitution of India, to grant leave to the petitioner herein to file review petition against the order of this Court made in W.P (MD)No.17857 of 2006 dated 20.09.2016.
Prayer in WP(MD). 17857/ 2016 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to grant Patta to the petitioners House Situated in R.S.No. G-1/79, Vadaseri Village, Agasteeswaram Taluk, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District within the time frame stipulated by this Honble court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to file a review petition against the order in W.P. No.17857 of 2016 should be granted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parvathipuram Udamoottu Dharmam of Arulmighu Subramaniaswamy Temple, Tiruchendur
- respondent
J. Spurgeon Samuel
- respondent
The District Collector, Kanyakumari District
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Agasteeswaram Taluk
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court