High Court of Madras dismissed a criminal revision for non-prosecution due to no appearance by the petitioner. The order contains no substantive legal principle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.06.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Crl.R.C.No.65 of 2014
N.Sivakami
... Petitioner
Vs.
Dhamodharan
... Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Revision filed under sections 397 read with 401 of Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records of the case in C.A.No.174 of 2012 on the file of V Additional District and Session Judge at Coimbatore and examine the legality and propriety of the proceedings and set aside the conviction of this petitioner dated 19.11.2013 in C.C.No.247 of 2011, Judicial Magistrate – FTC II, Coimbatore.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.T.Gowthaman
2
V.BHARATHIDASAN,J
rrg/rli
O R D E R
When the above Criminal Revision Case was posted for hearing on 06.07.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was posted today “ for dismissal ”.
Even today, (12.06.2017) there is no representation on behalf of the
petitioner either in person or through the counsel on record. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
12.06.2017
rrg/rli
To
Crl.R.C.No.65 of 2014
3
N.Sivakami
Dhamodharan
V.BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
