Dismissed

M.Yogamalar v. the Inspector General of

Madras HC31 Jan 2017WMP(MD)/1216/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a petition seeking a stay on further proceedings pursuant to an impugned G.O. The court dismissed the petition, ruling that interim relief must be adjudicated within the principal Writ Petition, rendering a separate stay petition liable for dismissal.

What did the court decide?

This petition was dismissed because the scope for grant of stay lies within the Writ Petition.

M.Yogamalar Vs the Inspector General of — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Thirty First day of January Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶5

WMP(MD) No.1216 of 2017 IN WP(MD) No.1496 of 2017

¶6

M.YOGAMALAR

¶7

... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶8

¶9

1 THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT,

¶10

RAJA ANNAMALAI PURAM,

¶11

FOUR SHORE ESTATE, CHENNAI-600 028

¶12

2 THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (FAC), GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU,

¶13

COMMERCIAL TAX AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT,

¶14

FORT ST. GEORGE,

¶15

CHENNAI-600 009 ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in G.O.(D).No.452 Commercial Tax and Registration Department dated 02.12.2016 which the consequential order of the 1st respondent in No.45440/Aa1/ 2013 dated 11.03.2016 pending disposal of the writ petition

¶17

ORDER : This petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.N.TAMILMANI, Advocate for the petitioner,while admitting the Writ Petition, the court made the following order:-

¶18

As the interim relief has got to be adjudicated in the Writ Petition there is no scope for grant of stay. Accordingly this petition is dismissed.

sd/-

31/01/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

¶24

1 THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, RAJA ANNAMALAI PURAM, FOUR SHORE ESTATE, CHENNAI-600 028

¶25

2 THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (FAC), GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU, COMMERCIAL TAX AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-600 009

¶26

nbi

¶27

CSL/RR-BS/SAR-III/02.02.2017 : 2P/3C

¶28

ORDER IN WMP(MD) No.1216 of 2017 IN WP(MD) No.1496 of 2017 Date :31/01/2017

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Yogamalar v. the Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Yogamalar v. the Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saravanan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Ismail, S/O.Syed Rowthar, Vs the Inspector of Police

G.Veluchamy Vs the Conservator of Forest

C.Karthick Vs the Secretary

G.Dhanalakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police

P.L.Muthu, Vs the District Collector