Saravanan v. the Sub Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought modification of bail conditions including bond deposit and extension of time for sureties. Court found compliance with conditions and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
None granted; petition closed due to compliance with conditions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of January Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN
CRL MP(MD) No.9521 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.17455 of 2016
SARAVANAN
... PETITIONER/PETITIONER
Vs
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT (CR.NO.337 OF 2016)
... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to modify the condition imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl O.P. (MD) No.17455 of 2016 in respect of depositing the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- to the credit of Crime No.337 of 2016 before the Judicial Magistrate, Natham and also consequently extend the time granted for producing the sureties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Saranathan
- respondent
The Sub Inspecting of Police, Natham Police Station, Dindigul District
Coram
S.Vaidyanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court