Appellants withdrew the writ appeal challenging the payment of 20% tax demand as per a prior order, and the court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, granting time to comply.
Writ Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; time granted to pay tax demand.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.07.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.A(MD)No.857 of 2017
and
C.M.P(MD) No.5795 of 2017
Tvl.Annai Velankanni Traders, Represented by its Proprietor, S.Anthonysami,
..Appellant/Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Office of the Principal and Special Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Ezhilagam, Chepauk,
Chennai - 600 005.
2.The Commercial Tax Officer, Tiruppathur Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Office,
5/4, 56, Chinna Thoppu Street, Sivagangai District - 630 211.
..Respondents/Respondents/ Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under clause 15 of Letter Patent Act, to set aside the order passed in W.M.P(MD)No.3439 of 2017 in W.P. (MD)No. 4286 of 2017 dated 14.03.2017.
Prayer in WMP(MD). 3439/ 2017 in WP(MD)No.4286/2017 :
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India pleased to grant an Interim Stay for the operation of the impugned proceedings of the 2nd Respondent in TIN. 33765502823/2014-2015 dated 12.01.2017 till the disposal of this WP.
Prayer in WP(MD).4286/ 2017 :
The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Constitution of India pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the 2nd
2
respondent in TIN 33765502823/2014-15 dated 12.01.2017 and quash the same.
For petitioner : Mr.B.Rooban For respondents : Mr.R.Karthikeyan Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.]
The learned counsel for the appellant made an endorsement, indicating that the appellant is withdrawing the Writ Appeal. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks reasonable time to pay 20 % of the tax demand, as indicated in the order, impugned in this intra-Court Writ Appeal.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Protocol)
/True Copy/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To:
1.The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Office of the Principal and Special Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
2.The Commercial Tax Officer, Tiruppathur Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Office, 5/4, 56, Chinna Thoppu Street, Sivagangai District - 630 211.
+One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.63312 +One cc to Mr.B.Rooban, Advocate, SR.No.63444 NB/dsk
RL/5C/2P/KP/SAR1/12/7/2017
JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)Nos.857 of 2017 and C.M.P(MD) No.5794 of 2017
03.07.2017
Tvl.Annai Velankanni Traders
S.Anthonysami
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Commercial Tax Officer
K.K.Sasidharan
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
