Writ Appeal filed against a single judge's order which itself had quashed an FIR. The appellant's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Writ Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 19.07.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.A.(MD)No.61 of 2014 and
M.P.(MD)No. 1 of 2014
S.Sivaraj : Appellant
Madurai District, Madurai.
4.R.Daisy
(Fourth and fifth respondents are impleaded vide order dated 20.01.2014 in M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2014)
: Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, against the order made in W.P.(MD)No.10056 of 2013 dated 11.12.2013.
Prayer in WP(MD). 10056/ 2013 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in Notice dated 29.01.2013 in pursuance of First Information Report Crime No.181 of 2012 on the file of the 3rd Respondent and quash the same as illegal, ultravires and unconstitutional and in consequence restrain the respondents, any of their officials from in any way search or seize the premises of the petitioner or compel the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner company to produce any pledged articles/jewels under the colour of investigation in pursuance of Crime No.181 of 2012.
2
For Appellant : Mr.V.Raghavachari
For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.M.Murugan
Government Pleader
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.]
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Writ Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to approach the appropriate forum.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(P&A)
/True Copy/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
Madurai District, Madurai.
+One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.66969 +One cc to Mr.V.Raghavachari, Advocate, SR.No.66737 MR RL/6C/2P/KK/SAR3/28/7/2017 JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD)No.61 of 2014 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 19.07.2017
S.Sivaraj
The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District
The Deputy Superintendent of Police (Crime), Madurai District
The Inspector of Police (Crime), Madurai District
R.Daisy
Ravi
M.M.Sundresh
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
