2.The respondent joined as Constable under the control of the third respondent during 1988 and worked in various places in Madurai City and was promoted as Grade-I Constable and promoted as Head Constable on 15.08.2008. The respondent came to adverse notice of the Department based on a complaint which lead to the issuance of charge proceedings in P.R.39 framing two charges, firstly, he had left the police station without obtaining permission and secondly, he has not given first aid to a person, who was lying unconscious. Along with the respondent, one other Special Sub- Inspector by name Mohankumar, was also issued a charge proceedings for the very same incident. The respondent submitted his explanation stating that he had obtained permission from the Sub Inspector of Police before leaving the station and the person, who is said to have been lying down on the road, was in drunken stage. Apart from that, the respondent also placed other factual details and requested to drop the proceedings. Not being satisfied with the explanation, an enquiry officer was appointed to enquire into the charges and he submitted his report holding that the charges are proved by report, dated 16.07.2004. The Disciplinary Authority by its order, dated 30.09.2004 imposed a punishment of reduction of pay by three stages for three years without cumulative effect. The order was implemented by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Commissioner of Police, Madurai City by proceedings, dated 03.11.2004.
