Allowed

M.Mary Cyril Saranya v. Mr.Sahaya Leo Yanaardu Rajesh

Madras HC19 Jun 2017TR CMP/839/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras transferred I.D.O.P.No.29 of 2016 from the District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur, to the District and Sessions Court, Chengalpattu. The transfer was permitted as the respondent consented. The court directed the transferring court to send records within two weeks and the receiving court to dispose of the case within six months.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of I.D.O.P.No.29 of 2016 from Thiruvallur to Chengalpattu; transmission of records within two weeks; disposal within six months.

M.Mary Cyril Saranya Vs Mr.Sahaya Leo Yanaardu… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 19-06-2017

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

¶5

Tr.C.M.P.No.839 of 2016

¶6

and C.M.P.No.20757 of 2016

¶7

M.Mary Cyril Saranya ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Sahaya Leo Yanaardu Rajesh ...Respondent

¶10

Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw and transfer the I.D.O.P.No.29 of 2016 pending on the file of the District and Sessions Court Thiruvallur to District and Sessions Court, Chengalpattu or any other competent Court nearer to the petitioner's residence.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Justin

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.I.Nagarajan

¶13

This transfer petition is filed to withdraw and transfer the I.D.O.P.No.29 of 2016 pending on the file of the District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur to the District and Sessions Court, Chengalpattu or any other competent Court near the petitioner's residence.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

¶15

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent has filed a memo to the effect that the respondent has no objection to transfer the I.D.O.P.No.29 of 2016, pending on the file of District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur to the file of District and Sessions Court, Chengalpattu and also prayed for early disposal, and the same is recorded.

¶16

In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the respondent, the petition in I.D.O.P.No.29 of 2016 is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the District and

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Sessions Court, Thiruvallur and transferred to the District and Sessions Court, Chengalpattu. The District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur is directed to transmit all the records pertaining to I.D.O.P.No.29 of 2016 to the file of District and Sessions Court, Chengalpattu, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The District and Sessions Court, Chengalpattu is directed to dispose of the case, as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the said records.

¶19

Accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous petition is ordered. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶20

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pvs
To
1.The District and Sessions Court,
Thiruvallur.
2.The District and Sessions Court,
Chengalpattu.
+2cc to Mr.Nagarajan, Advocate, S.R.No.43027

¶21

Tr.C.M.P.No.839 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.20757 of 2016 MG(CO) RS(03/07/2017)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Mary Cyril Saranya v. Mr.Sahaya Leo Yanaardu Rajesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Mary Cyril Saranya v. Mr.Sahaya Leo Yanaardu Rajesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Samundeeswaran Vs P. Ramanathan

Manimegalai Vs Sumathi

M. Ramalakshmi Vs a. Maharajan

A.Mahalakshmi Vs D.Dayanidhi

P. Punithamozhi Vs S. Nagendran

Mrs. Sethu Vs Mr. C.T.Ayyappan