In a Single Appellate remedy under Article 189 of CPC, the Madras High Court condoned a delay of 118 days in representing a contempt petition filed under WP(MD)No.6481 of 2008, allowing the application after being satisfied with the affidavit.
The application to condone a delay of 118 days in representing contempt proceedings is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Eighth day of February Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN
SUB A(MD) No.2 of 2017 IN CONT P(MD) No.SR6693 of 2016 in WP(MD)No.6481 of 2008
G.RAGAVENDRAN ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER
Vs
MR.D.S.VINCENT THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TNSTC (MADURAI) LTD., BYE PASS ROAD, MADURAI. ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 118 days in representing the contempt petition in Contempt Petition (MD).SR.No.6693/2016.
PRAYER IN CONT P(MD) No.SR6693 of 2016:
initiate contempt proceedings against the Contempnor/Respondent and punish him for willful disobedience of the order of the Hon'ble High Court in WP(MD)No.6481 of 2008 dated 16.02.2009
Prayer in WP(MD). 6481/ 2008 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to forthwith disbursepetitioner retirement benefits of Rs. 3, 28,778/- towards the commutation of pension and earned leave salary payable to petitioner with reasonable rate of interest at early date that may be fixed by this Honourable Court.
ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing
the arguments of M/S. A.RAHUL, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-
Being satisfied with the reasons stated in affidavit filed in support of this application, the delay is condoned and the Application is allowed.
28/02/2017
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO
BYE PASS ROAD, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN
SUB A(MD) No.2 of 2017
IN
WP(MD)No.6481 of 2008
SMA/PM-AN/SAR-2/07.03.2017:2P/2C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 118 days in representing a contempt petition.
G.RAGAVENDRAN
MR.D.S.VINCENT
S.VAIDYANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
