V.Selvaraj v. Pol Matilda
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application for condonation of delay in filing a contempt petition, the Madras High Court condoned the petitioner's 105-day delay and allowed the application.
What did the court decide?
Condonation of delay of 105 days and allowance of the application to institute contempt proceedings.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Eighth day of February Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN
SUB A(MD) No.10 of 2017 IN CONT P(MD) No.SR12623 of 2016 IN WP(MD)NO.8107 OF 2015
V.SELVARAJ ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER
Vs
1 POL MATILDA THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DT.
2 PADMAKUMAR THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, MARTHANDAM PO, KANYAKUMARI DT.
3 JEYANTHI THE JUNIOR ENGINEER, DISTRIBUTION AND MAINTENANCE, TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, SILUVAI PURAM, KOLLAMCODE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS/CONTEMNORS
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 105 days in representing this contempt petition.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 105 days in representing the contempt petition should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.SELVARAJ
- respondent
1 POL MATILDA THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DT.
- respondent
2 PADMAKUMAR THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, MARTHANDAM PO, KANYAKUMARI DT.
- respondent
3 JEYANTHI THE JUNIOR ENGINEER, DISTRIBUTION AND MAINTENANCE, TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, SILUVAI PURAM, KOLLAMCODE, KANYAKUMARI DT.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court