In a second appeal where parties settled the matter and paid the claim amount out of court, the Madras High Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous.
Second Appeal dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 12.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
S.A.(MD)No.623 of 2011 and
M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011
Pakkir Mohideen Rowther ..Appellant/ Respondent/Defendant
Vs.
A.Mohamed Ismail .. Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.9 of 2009 dated 15.06.2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli modifying the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.107 of 2007, dated 22.01.2009, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Valliyoor.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Suresh Kumar
For Respondent : Mr.H.Arumugam
JUDGMENT
Challenging the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.9 of 2009, on the file of the Principal District Court, Tirunelveli reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.107 of 2007, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Valliyoor, the defendant has filed the above Second Appeal.
2
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-I)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
S.A.(MD)No.623 of 2011
12.01.2017
SMA/SS-2-KSM/25.01.2017:2P/5C
Pakkir Mohideen Rowther
A. Mohamed Ismail
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
