Mercyrajam v. Daisy Hilda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court condoned the delay of 391 days in filing a second appeal petition upon payment of Rs.750 as costs to Day Care Creche, failing which the petition will stand dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Condoned the delay of 391 days by directing the petitioners to pay Rs.750 to the Women Advocate Association creche within two weeks.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twelfth day of January Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DURAISWAMY
CMP(MD) No.204 of 2017 IN
SA(MD) No.SR18359 of 2015
- 1 MERCYRAJAM
- 2 JASMINE PRAMILA
- 3 SERIN SHARMILA ... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS
Vs
- 1 DAISY HILDA
- 2 ROACH SELVADURAI
- 3 NARAGUNAPAKIYASEELI
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 391 days in representing the second appeal papers can be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mercyrajem
- appellant
Jasmine Prmila
- appellant
Serin Sharmila
- respondent
Daisy Hilda
- respondent
Roach Selvadurai
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court