V.Samynathan v. Chandra (Deceased)
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Madras dismissed the second appeal as withdrawn. The appellant represented that the matter was settled out of court and sought permission to withdraw the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.08.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.BASKARAN
Second Appeal No.89 of 2013
V.Samynathan .. Appellant
Vs.
Chandra(deceased)
Kapali .. Respondent
* * *
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the
Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.3 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate
Judge, Ponneri dated 30.03.2012 by reversing the judgment and decree
passed in O.S.No.110 of 2002 on the file of District Munsif, Ponneri dated
19.02.2009.
For Appellant : M/s.S.D.Balaji For Respondent : M/s.N.Anand Venkatesh
J U D G M E N T
Today, when the matter is called, the learned counsel for the
appellant represented that the matter has been settled out of court and seeks permission to withdraw the appeal and he also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V.Samynathan
- respondent
Chandra Kapali
Coram
S.Baskaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court