This court disposed of the second appeal by dismissing it as withdrawn after the counsel for the respondent withdrew appearance and the counsel for the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal. Costs were directed to be borne by both parties.
Second Appeal No.1152 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 dismissed as withdrawn. Costs to parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.08.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.BASKARAN
Second Appeal No.1152 of 2011 and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.09.2010 passed in A.S.No.197 of 2009 on the file of learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court, F.T.C.V), Chennai, reversing the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2008 passed in O.S.No.204 of 2008 on the file of learned XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.A.L.Natarajan
J U D G M E N T
Today, the learned counsel for the respondent has entered appearance and filed a memo withdrawing the vakalat and his appearance.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
asi/uma
To
1.The Additional District Judge
(Fast Track Court, F.T.C.V),
Chennai.
2.The XIV Assistant Judge,
City Civil Court,
Chennai.
3.The Section Officer,
V.R.Section,
High Court, Madras 104.
+1cc to Mr.A.L.Natarajan, Advocate, S.R.No.58635
Second Appeal No.1152 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
KGK(CO)
CA(04/09/2017)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lloyd Fernandez
Helen Fernandez
Mark Fernandez
Moureen Berlie
S. Baskaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
