D.Raju v. a. Dhanapal[Died]
Case brief
What is this about?
In a second appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., the High Court at Madras dismissed the petition after granting the appellant permission to withdraw the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27.10.2017 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR S.A.No.383 of 2014
D.Raju ... Appellant
Versus
1.A.Dhanapal (Died) 2.D.Venkatesan 3.The Secretary, Uthangarai Taluk, Co-operative Housing Society, N.A.H.S.G.47, Uthangarai, Krishnagiri District. 4.K.Lakshmana Chettiar 5.K.Senthamarai 6.M.Iyyappan 7.M.Atralarasu 8.Attukkara Palani 9.Shivalingam 10.Krishnasamy Iyer 11.Madesh 12.Tmt.Bakkiam 13.Chandra 14.Nagalakshmi 15.Ramachandran 16.Indirakumari 17.R.Balarama Chakkaravarthy 18.Jayakumari 19.Sivakami ... Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.10 of 2011 dated 04.10.2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.97 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Krishnagiri dated 23.09.2010.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ragupathi Raj For Respondents : R1 Died
RR2,3 & 10 No appearance RR4 to 9, RR11 to 19(Exparte)
O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and has also https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
D.Raju
- respondent
1.A.Dhanapal (Died)
- respondent
2.D.Venkatesan
- respondent
The Secretary, Uthangarai Taluk, Co-operative Housing Society
- respondent
4.K.Lakshmana Chettiar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court