B.Nagammal v. S.Mekala
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed a petition seeking condonation of delay in filing an application to restore a file, as the petition was not pressed by the learned counsel.
What did the court decide?
Petition in CMP No.4520 of 2014 dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Twenty Seventh day of October Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
CMP No.4520 of 2017
IN SA.873/2014
1 B.NAGAMMAL [ PETITIONERS ]
Vs
1 S.MEKALA [ RESPONDENTS ]
2 TAMILNADU
SLUM CLEARANCE BOARD REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN, NO. 5, KAMARAJAR SALAI, CHENNAI 5
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone he delay of 816 days in filing the restore application to set aside the order of dismissal of default and pass such further or other orders IN CMP No.4520 of 2017 Pending disposal of the above SA.873/2014.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.NAGAMMAL
- respondent
S.MEKALA
- respondent
TAMILNADU SLUM CLEARANCE BOARD
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court