Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was heard. The appellant was absent. The appeal was dismissed for default without costs. No merits were decided.
Second Appeal dismissed for default; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 25.07.2017
Coram
The Honourable Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN
Second Appeal No.1925 of 2000
Anandan .. Appellant/Appellant/
Plaintiff
/versus/
1.D.Pushpa Ammal @ Pushpa
2.R.Sudarsanam .. Respondents/Respondents/
Defendants
Prayer: Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of
Code of Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment of the
Principal Sub Judge, Chengalpattu made in A.S.No.81 of 1998
dated 21.03.2000 confirming the decree and judgment of the
Court of the District Munsif, Chengalpet made in O.S.No.91 of
1995 dated 29.09.1997.
For Appellant :No appearance
For Respondents :Mr.M.S.Subramanian for R1 and R2
JUDGMENT
Today when the case is taken up for hearing, there is no
representation for the appellant. Hence, this Second Appeal is
dismissed for default. No costs.
Sd/-
Deputy Registrar(J)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ari
To
S.A.No.1925 of 2000
RSK(CO)
GN(17/08/2017)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anandan
D. Pushpa Ammal @ Pushpa
R. Sudarsanam
Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
