Perumal Gounder, v. Yogamurthy
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a second appeal as withdrawn by the appellant following an out-of-court settlement. The connected motion pending was also closed.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; connected motion closed; no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.04.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
S.A.No.1618 of 2010
Perumal Gounder ... Appellant/Defendant/Appellant
Vs.
1.Yogamurthy
2.Saraswathi
3.Banumathi ... Respondents/Plaintiffs/
Respondents
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure
Code against the judgment and decree dated 17.08.2010 made in
A.S.No.43 of 2009 on the file of the Subordinate Court,
Gobichettipalayam, confirming the judgment and decree dated
29.11.2007 made in O.S.No.144 of 2006 on the file of the
District Munsif Court, Gobichettipalayam.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Mukunth
For Respondents : Mr.S.Ramesh Kumar
J U D G M E N T
It is represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that the matter has been settled out of Court between the parties and he seeks permission to withdraw the Second Appeal. He has made an endorsement in the court bundle and has also sent a letter to the Registry to that effect.
- In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2010 is closed.
Sd/-
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Perumal Gounder
- respondent
Yogamurthy
- respondent
Saraswathi
- respondent
Banumathi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court