Maragadammal v. Maheswari
Case brief
What is this about?
A second appeal was abated because the sole appellant died. Related miscellaneous applications were closed.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was abated due to the death of the sole appellant. Connected applications were closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.04.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
S.A.No.1392 of 2008
Maragadammal .. Appellant/Plaintiff/Appellant
Vs.
- Maheswari 2. Vijayalakshmi ... Respondents/Defendant/Respondent Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 08.01.2008 passed in A.S.No.91 of 2006 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Ranipet, Vellore District, confirming the judgment and decree dated 25.02.2005 passed in O.S.No.17 of 2003 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Arcot, Vellore District.
For Appellant : Mr.N.S.Sivakumar
For Respondents : Mr.P.Mani
J U D G M E N T
It is represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that the sole appellant died. Recording his submission, this Second Appeal is abated. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2008 and C.M.P.No.404 of 2016 are closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Maragadammal
- respondent
Maheswari
- respondent
Vijayalakshmi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court