Arumugham. v. Eswaran.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Madras dismissed a withdrawal petition from an appeal under Section 100 CPC after the appellant's counsel reported that the matter between the parties had been settled.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date: 03.03.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
S.A.No.1557 of 1999
Arumugham .. Appellant/5th respondent/ 5th Defendant
Versus
1.Eswaran
2.Ramar
3.Chinnammal
4.Chinnasamy
5.Rathinam
6.Ganthimathi
7.Pounambal
8.Santhosham .. Respondents/Appellants/
Defendants 1,3,4,6 & 7
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure
Code to set aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.119
of 1997 dated 30.10.1998 by the Principal District Court,
Villupuram modifying the judgment and decree passed in
O.S.No.274 of 1996 dated 05.12.1996 on the file of the Civil
Judge (Senior Division) (Sub Judge's Court) Kallakurichi.
For Appellant : Ms.P.T.Asha
for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates
For Respondents: No appearance
JUDGMENT
The above appeal is listed for hearing today. It is submitted by Ms.P.T.Asha, representing counsel for Mr/s.Sarvabhauman Associates, appearing on behalf of the appellant, that the matter has been settled between the parties and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal and also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Arumugham
- respondent
1. Eswaran
- respondent
2. Ramar
- respondent
3. Chinnammal
- respondent
4. Chinnasamy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court