Dismissed

Rangasamy Gounder (Deceased) v. Chidambaram

Madras HC2 Mar 2017SA/1402/1999

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed as the matter between parties was reported to be settled out of court. The incumbent registrar noted the submission and disposed of the appeal and the connected miscellaneous petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

The second appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Rangasamy Gounder (Deceased) Vs Chidambaram — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 02.03.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

S.A.No. 1402 of 1999

¶6

and C.M.P.No.14806 of 1999

¶7

Rangasamy Gounder (deceased) 2. Eswari 3. Palanisamy (Appellants 2 & 3 brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole appellant vide Court order dated 15.02.2017

¶8

made in C.M.P.No.240 to 242 of 2009 in S.A.No.1402 of 1999) ...Appellants/Appellants/ Defendants/Respondents Vs.

¶9

1. Chidambaram 2. Natarajan 3. Murugesen 4. Ramasamy 5. Deivathal 6. Pazhanathal 7. Balasubramaniyam ...Respondents/Respondents/ Plaintiffs/Defendants 2 to 5/ Petitioner/Respondents 2 to 5

¶10

Prayer:- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment dated 19.04.1999 passed in A.S.No.52 of 1998 before the learned II Additional District Court, Coimbatore confirming the judgment and decree dated 13.06.1997 passed in I.A.No.196 of 1994 in O.S.No.522 of 1994 before the learned Principal Subordinate Judge Court, Coimbatore.

¶11

For Appellants : Mrs.R.Meenal

¶12

For Respondents: Mr.K.Mohanram for R1,2,4 to 6 R3 - No appearance R7 – No ready in notice

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

JUDGMENT

¶15

The learned counsel appearing for the appellants reports that the matter between the parties is settled out of Court and the second appeal may be dismissed as settled out of Court.

¶16

Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the second appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/-

¶18

Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rts
To
1. The II Additional District Court,
Coimbatore.
2. The Principal Subordinate Judge Court,
Coimbatore.
3. The Section Officer,
V.R.Section, High Court,
Madras.
+1cc to Mr.Venkateswaran, Advocate, S.R.No.13791
NMJ(CO)
RS(20/03/2017)

¶19

S.A.No.1402 of 1999 and C.M.P.No.14806 of 1999

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rangasamy Gounder (Deceased) v. Chidambaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rangasamy Gounder (Deceased) v. Chidambaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kothandan (Deceased) Vs Mangal Lakshmi

Malaipierumal Vs Sri Sivaloganathar Swami

K.P. Lakshmanan. Vs D. Prabhu.

Chinnappa Vs Peddanna @ Venkatasamy and

Jagadambal Vs Suresh Kumar

1. Maliq John Vs Rukija Beevi, Rep. by Her