Govindan v. Nagarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
This review application allowed, in consent, the impugned order condoning delay and setting it aside for a fresh hearing before the trial court to examine specific documentary evidence.
What did the court decide?
Initial order condoning delay set aside; matter remanded to trial court for fresh hearing and evidence examination within eight weeks.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.11.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Review Application No.207 of 2017
against
C.R.P. No.4787 of 2014
Govindan ..Petitioner
Vs.
Nagarajan ..Respondent
PRAYER : Review Application is filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of C.P.C., to review the final order dated 10.03.2017 made in C.R.P.(NPD) No.4787 of 2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi For Respondent : Mr.R.Rajarajan
ORDER
By the order dated 10.03.2017, this Court has allowed the
Revision Petition, condoning the delay of 121 days in filing the
Application on payment of cost. The present review has been filed by
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Govindan
- respondent
Nagarajan
Coram
D. KRISHNAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court