Srinivasan v. Girija
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed Civil Revision Petitions as infructuous based on an endorsement by the petitioners' counsel that nothing surviving in the petitions. The matter was disposed of without substantive adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as infructuous; No costs; Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.11.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
CRP.PD.Nos.49 & 50 of 2016
and
CMP.No.252 of 2016
1.Srinivasan
2.Dr.Kannan ..Petitioners
in both CRP's
Vs.
1.Girija
2.Srinivasan ..Respondents
in both CRP's
COMMON PRAYER :
The Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India to set aside the fair orders and decretal orders dated 24.02.2015 and 07.09.2015 passed in I.A.Nos.519 of 2011
and 401 of 2015 in O.S.No.103 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Cuddalore.
For petitioners : Mr.D.Baskar in both CRP's
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Srinivasan
- petitioner
Dr. Kannan
- respondent
Girija
- respondent
Srinivasan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court