Allowed

M/s.Hcl Infosystems Ltd., v. M/s.Electronics Corporation of

Madras HC21 Jul 2017OP/418/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Madras High Court appointed Mr. Justice N.V. Balasubramanian as a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a Tender Document dated 20.08.2011, based on the parties' subsequent mutual consent.

What did the court decide?

Appointed Mr. Justice N.V. Balasubramanian as sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from the Tender Document dated 20.08.2011.

M/s.Hcl Infosystems Ltd., Vs M/s.Electronics Corporation of — Arbitration | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 21.07.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶6

O.P.No. 418 of 2017
M/s. HCL Infosystems Ltd.,
E-4, 5,6, Sector – 11,
Noida,
Uttar Pradesh
..Petitioner
Vs
M/s.Electronics Corporation of
Tamil Nadu,
692, Anna Salai,
Nandanam,
Chennai 600 035 .. Respondent

¶7

Prayer: Petition filed under section11(5) read with 10(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to appoint a sole arbitrator as provided under clause 3.35 of the Tender to adjudicate upon the differences and disputes between the parties under the Tender Document dated 20.08.2011 and subsequent Purchase Orders dated 15.2.2012 and 22.01.2013. For Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Balaji

¶8

For Respondent : Mr.Vijayan for M/s.King and Patridge

¶9

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶10

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This petition is filed seeking appointment of arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes arising between the parties out of tender document dated 20.08.2011.

¶13

There is agreement between the parties on the existence of disputes interse. However, there was no concurrence between the parties on the person to be nominated as Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the same in terms of Article 3.35 of Agreement dated 20.08.2011.

¶14

Dehors objections and counter objections raised by both parties in the course of communication inter se, when the matter is called for hearing, today, learned counsel for both sides would agree that the disputes could be adjudicated upon by Mr. Justice N.V.Balasubramanian, former Judge of this Court.

¶15

In view of the consent expressed, I appoint Mr. Justice Mr.

¶16

N.V.Balasubramanian, former Judge of this Court, Residency Dhanam, Door No.17/8, V Trust Cross Street, Mandavelipakkam, Chennai -28, (Ph: 9442453399) as the Sole Arbitrator to enter upon reference and adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties emanating from the tender document dated 20.08.2011. The learned Arbitrator may endeavour to conclude proceedings as expeditiously as possible. The learned Arbitrator is at liberty to fix his remuneration and other incidental expenses. The proceedings may be conducted under the aegis of the

¶17

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶18

¶19

Madras High Court Arbitration Centre and in accordance with the Madras High

¶20

Court Arbitration Rules.

¶21

The Original Petition is, accordingly, allowed, leaving the parties to bear

¶22

their own costs.
21.07.2017
Index:Yes/No
Speaking order/non speaking order
msr
DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.
msr

¶23

O.P.No. 418 of 2017

¶24

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶25

¶26

21.07.2017

¶27

http://www.judis.nic.in

M/s.Hcl Infosystems Ltd., v. M/s.Electronics Corporation of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Hcl Infosystems Ltd., v. M/s.Electronics Corporation of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Cholamandalam Investment Vs Rahul Zodape

M/s.Updater Services Pvt.Ltd., Vs M/s.Toll (India)Logistics Pvt.

R.Kalyanaraman Vs M/S.Shriram City Union Finance

Qube Cinema Technologies Pvt. Vs M/s.Pavalam Theatre

Qube Cinema Technologies Pvt. Vs Vijay Theatre

Texmo Industries Vs Aseem Jain