Allowed

M/s.Updater Services Pvt.Ltd., v. M/s.Toll (India)Logistics Pvt.

Madras HC20 Jul 2017OP/306/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order addresses a petition for appointing a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, between M/s. Updater Services and M/s. Toll (India) Logistics. The court appointed Mr. M.S.Sampath as the arbitrator and directed proceedings through the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr.M.S.Sampath as Sole Arbitrator; proceedings under Madras High Court Arbitration Centre and Rules.

M/s.Updater Services Pvt.Ltd., Vs M/s.Toll (India)Logistics Pvt. — Arbitration | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 20.07.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶6

O.P.No. 306 of 2017

¶7

M/s. Updater Services Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Vice President, Having registered Office at No. 2/302-A,UDS Salai,Off.OMR, Thoraipakkam, Chennai 600 097. ..Petitioner Vs M/s.Toll (India) Logistics Pvt. Ltd., Toll Global Logistics Division, represented by its General Manager South and East Mr.Ramesh Dharmu Having Office at No.9A, Puzhal Ambattur Road, 1^st Street, Puzhal, Chennai 600 066. .. Respondent

¶8

Prayer: Petition filed under section11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying for appointment of a sole arbitrator for resolving the dispute between the parties, u/s.11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr. J. Nandagopal

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.S. Raghavan

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This petition seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent.

¶13

When the matter is called for hearing today, both the learned counsel

¶14

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶15

¶16

do not dispute either the clause for Arbitration or the existence of disputes inter

¶17

se. They would suggest on the appointment of sole Arbitrator.

¶18

I, thus, appoint Mr.M.S.Sampath, Advocate, No.42, Minor Trustpuram, 3^rd Street, Choolaimedu, Chennai-94, as the Sole Arbitrator to enter upon reference and adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties. He may, after issuing notice to the parties and upon hearing them, pass an award preferably within a periodof six months from the date of receipt of this order. The learned Arbitrator is at liberty to fix his remuneration and other incidental expenses. The proceedings may be conducted under the aegis of the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre and in accordance with the Madras High Court Arbitration Rules.

¶19

The Original Petition is, accordingly, allowed, leaving the parties to

¶20

bear their own costs.

¶21

20.07.2017

¶22

Index:Yes/No Speaking order/non speaking order msr

¶23

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶24

¶25

DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.
msr
O.P.No. 306 of 2017

¶26

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶27

¶28

20.07.2017

¶29

http://www.judis.nic.in

M/s.Updater Services Pvt.Ltd., v. M/s.Toll (India)Logistics Pvt.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Updater Services Pvt.Ltd., v. M/s.Toll (India)Logistics Pvt.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Cotton House Vs New Cotton House

M/S.Zebronics India Pvt.Ltd. Vs Mr.Lalesh Kumar Jain

Mr.Rajan K.R. Vs M/s. Featherlite Estates

M/s.Cholamandalam Investment Vs Rahul Zodape

R.Kalyanaraman Vs M/S.Shriram City Union Finance

Qube Cinema Technologies Pvt. Vs M/s.Pavalam Theatre