M.Mariyammal A-58 v. the Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Mother filed Habeas Corpus for her son. Court held arrest in IPC case valid with judicial custody remand. Petition closed as no illegal custody found.
What did the court decide?
Habeas Corpus petition closed as detenu was not in illegal custody.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 21.02.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
H.C.P.[MD].No.253 of 2017
M.Mariyammal
: Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District.
2.The Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. : Respondents
PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the body of the petitioner's son - Chennaraja, S/o.Late, Muthupandi Thevar, aged about 28 years, before this Court and set him at liberty.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Mariyammal
- respondent
Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District
- respondent
Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court