Petition filed for writ of habeas corpus regarding illegal detention of petitioner's daughter and granddaughter. детену produced and expressed willingness to go with petitioner, closing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 20.02.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
H.C.P.[MD].No.107 of 2017
E.Erulandi : Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District.
2.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Nathampatti Police Station, Nathampatti,
Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
3.V.Thangapandi : Respondents
PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the first and second respondents to produce the body or person of the petitioner's daughter, detenue, namely Pethammal, W/o.Marimuthu, aged about 30 years and his granddaughter, namely Minor M.Mariammal, D/o.Marimuthu, aged 8 years, from the illegal custody of the third respondent and hand over them to the custody of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Gunasekaran For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.K.S.Duraipandian Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
***************
[ Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J.] Seeking production of the detenues viz., Pethammal, W/o.Marimuthu, aged about 30 years and Minor M.Mariammal, D/o.Marimuthu, aged about 8 years, the petitioner has filed the present Habeas Corpus Petition.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petitioner has stated that he is the father of the first detenue-
2
Pethammal and the grandfather of the second detenue-Mariammal. The first detenue was given in marriage with one Marimuthu in the year 2000 and her husband is suffering from psychological disorder. While so, both the detenues were found missing from 22.12.2016 onwards and suspecting that the third respondent had illegally detained them, the petitioner lodged a complainant before the second respondent on 06.01.2017. However, no effective steps were taken to trace out the detenues so far. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the present petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(P&A)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Nathampatti Police Station, Nathampatti, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
SML
CSL/JM/02.03.2017 : 2P/4C
Order made in H.C.P.[MD].No.107 of 2017 Dated: 20.02.2017
E.Erulandi
Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Nathampatti Police Station
V.Thangapandi
R.SUBBIAH
J.NISHA BANU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
