Nallasivan, v. the Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition seeking release of his son and his daughter-in-law. The court noted provisions for police protection addressed the apprehension of threats, resulting in the closure of the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed; liberty given to complain to third respondent for police protection as and when needed.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.07.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
H.C.P.(MD) No.1112 of 2017
Nallasivan ... Petitioner -vs1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Tenkasi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.
4.The Inspector of Police, Shenkottai Police Station, Tirunelveli District.
5.Dhayalal Patel 6.Praveen V Patel ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein to secure the detenues namely MATHAN RAGAVENDRA, S/o.Nallasivan, aged about 23 years and HEMANJI D/o.Dhayalal Patel, aged about 23 years and produce the body of the detenues before this Hon'ble Court and set them at liberty.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nallasivan
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli
- respondent
The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi
- respondent
The Inspector of Police, Tenkasi Police Station
- respondent
The Inspector of Police, Shenkottai Police Station
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court