R.Krishnan v. State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 226 for Habeas Corpus regarding minor child produced. Court closed petition, directing future visitation disputes to pending civil proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed. No further orders directed for visitation as matter pending in civil suit.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.12.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER And
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
H.C.P.No.2218 of 2017
R.Krishnan ... Petitioner
-vs-
1. State rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
Keezhkattalai Police Station,
Chennai-600 117.
2. N.Shanthi
3. R.Sundararaman ... Respondents
* *
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the
respondents herein to produce the person and body of the
petitioner's daughter “Minor Nandhini Krishnan” aged about 2
years and 2 months, before this Court and set her at liberty.
* *
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan
For Respondents: Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.]
- The main relief sought in the petition was to secure the petitioner's minor child, i.e., Nandhini Krishnan, who is aged about two (2) years and two (2) months.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Krishnan
- respondent
The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Keezhkattalai Police Station, Chennai-600 117
- respondent
N.Shanthi
- respondent
R.Sundararaman
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court