Petition for Habeas Corpus to quash a detention order was closed as infructuous because the detention order against the detenu was revoked by the Government. The High Court disposed of the writ without an elaborate order.
None granted. Petition closed as infructuous due to revocation of the detention order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 13.12.2017
Coram
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER & THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
H.C.P.No.1656 of 2017
Kannan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.State of Tamil Nadu
Rep by its
Additional Chief Secretary to Government
Department of Home, Prohibition and Excise
Secretariat,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.The District Collector and
District Magistrate,
O/o.The District Collector and
District Magistrate,
Ariyalur District,
Ariyalur.
3.The Inspector of Police
Udayarpalayam Police Station
Ariyalur District. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for records in Cr.M.P.No.17 of 2017 dated 16.08.2017 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the detention order as illegal and direct the respondents to produce the detenu Karnan, Son of Nagamuthu, aged about 34 years detenu now confined at Central Prison, Trichy and set him at liberty.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Pavendhan For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran, Addl. Public Prosecutor.
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J)
1.1. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.
+1cc to Mr.G.PAVENDHAN Advocate, S.R.No. 89627
H.C.P.No.1656 of 2017
TR(03/01/2018)
Kannan
State of Tamil Nadu
The District Collector and District Magistrate, Ariyalur
The Inspector of Police
Rajiv Shakdher
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
