Partly allowed

J.Andrews, v. The Tamil Nadu Electricity

Madras HC12 Dec 2017WA/1602/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellant sought to withdraw a writ appeal filed under the Letters Patent Act against an order dated 05.10.2017, requesting more time to pay a sum of Rs.7,50,000. The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with liberty to approach the learned Single Judge for an extension of time to pay the stipulated amount, but reserved costs.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Single Judge for more time to pay Rs.7,50,000; no order as to costs.

J.Andrews, Vs The Tamil Nadu Electricity — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 12.12.2017

¶4

Coram

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER &

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶7

W.A.No.1602 of 2017 J.Andrews ... Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶8

2.The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Charmian cum Managing Director 10^th Floor, NPKRR Maaligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600002.

¶9

3.The Assistant Executive Engineer (i/c) NEDC/Operation & Maintenance, TANGEDCO, South Nagapattinam, Melakottaivasal, Thiruvarur Main Road, Nagapattinam – 611 001.

¶10

4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, TANGEDCO, South Nagapattinam, Melakottaivasal, Thiruvarur Main Road,

¶11

Nagapattinam – 611 001.

¶12

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶13

¶14

5.The Junior Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, Velankanni – 611 111.

¶15

.. Respondents

¶16

PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act against the order dated 05.10.2017 made in W.M.P.No.26940 of 2017 in W.P.No.25531 of

¶17

¶18

For Appellant : Mr.R.Bharath Kumar
JUDGMENT
( Judgment of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J)
1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to

¶19

withdraw the appeal, with liberty to approach the learned Single Judge, for granting more time to pay the sum of Rs.7,50,000/- (Rupees seven lakhs fifty thousand only) referred to in the impugned order.

¶20

The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as

¶21

prayed for. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

12.12.2017

Index : yes/no

vsm

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶26

¶27

¶28

1.The Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶29

2.The Charmian cum Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., 10^th Floor, NPKRR Maaligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600002.

¶30

3.The Assistant Executive Engineer (i/c) NEDC/Operation & Maintenance, TANGEDCO, South Nagapattinam, Melakottaivasal, Thiruvarur Main Road, Nagapattinam – 611 001.

¶31

4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, TANGEDCO, South Nagapattinam, Melakottaivasal, Thiruvarur Main Road, Nagapattinam – 611 001.

¶32

5.The Junior Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, Velankanni – 611 111.

¶33

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶34

¶35

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
and
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶36

vsm
W.A.No.1602 of 2017

¶37

12.12.2017

¶38

http://www.judis.nic.in

J.Andrews, v. The Tamil Nadu Electricity

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Andrews, v. The Tamil Nadu Electricity

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Chandiran, Vs The Tamil Nadu State

J.Devadoss s/o. Joseph, Vs The Chairman

S.Rabik Raja Vs The General Manager

S.Vishnuvarma Vs The Secretary

Imran@ Mohammed Imran Vs the Secretary to Government

N.Murugesan, M/a 55 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its