A.Munusamy v. R.T.Arasu
Case brief
What is this about?
In an Election Petition and connected Original Applications, the Court dismissed the Election Petition and closed the Original Applications because a prior order striking off substantial paragraphs left nothing for adjudication.
What did the court decide?
The Election Petition No.20 of 2016 was dismissed and connected Original Applications were closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Election Petition No. 20 of 2016
and
O.A.Nos.28, 748 and 749 of 2017
ELP No.20 of 2016
A.Munusamy, S/o.R.Arumugam, No.3/365, Padavattamman Koil Street, Kazhipattur Village, Padur Post, Thiruporur Taluk, Kanchipuram District Pin 603 103. ... Petitioner -VS1.R.T.Arasu, S/o.Thandiyan, No.1/22, Mariyamman Koil Street, Irumbedu Village, Maduranthagam Taluk, Kanchipuram District 603 301. 2.P.Sampath, No.51, Thenneripattu Village, Vellore Post, Cheyyur Taluk, Kanchipuram District 603 401.
3.T.Ramesh, No.14, Manju Villagam, Paraman Keni, Sekkanankuppam Post, Cheyyur Taluk, Kanchipuram District 603 305.
4.Ehil Karoline, No.64, Padmavathi Nagar Main Road, Madampakkam, Chennai 600 126.
5.I.Kannan,
No.5/645, Kalaimagal Street, New Otteri Extention, Vandalur, Chennai 600 048.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Munusamy
- respondent
R.T.Arasu
- respondent
P.Sampath
- respondent
T.Ramesh
- respondent
Ehil Karoline
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court