Ponnusamy v. Packiaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
A petition was filed to condone a 123-day delay in filing a criminal appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel, with liberty to pursue remedies known to law.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to work out remedy; Criminal Appeal closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 07.11.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH
Crl.M.P.No.2760 of 2016
in Crl.A.No.SR.10820 of 2016
Ponnusamy .... Petitioner
Vs
Packiaraj .... Respondent
Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 123 days in filing the above appeal against the order dated 02.09.2015 passed in C.M.P.No.2259 of 2010 of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathyamangalam.
ORDER
This petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 123 days in filing a criminal appeal can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Whether the petition filed to condone delay should be allowed or dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ponnusamy
- respondent
Packiaraj
Coram
P.N. PRAKASH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court