Essel vision productions Ltd. v. Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited
Madras HCCS/783/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CS.No.783 of 2007 P.T.ASHA, J. The note of…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CS.No.783 of 2007
¶2
CS.No.783 of 2007
¶3
P.T.ASHA, J.
¶4
The note of the Registry would show that the written statement filed by D9 and D10 had been returned as early as on 08.07.2010 and the same is yet to be represented.
¶5
- The learned counsel for the defendants 9 and 10 undertakes to take the return and represent the same.
¶6
- The first defendant has filed his written statement on 21.11.2013. The other defendants though served have not filed their written statement and consequently they are set ex parte.
¶7
- For filing written statement of defendants 9 and 10, post the matter on 19.11.2020.
¶8
14.10.2020
¶9
mrn
¶10
1/1
Coram
AI extract
P.T.ASHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court