M/S.H.J.Hansen Recycling Ltd. v. M/S.a.R.S. Metals Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed as withdrawn with settled out of court. Refund of Court fee ordered.
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…
Suit dismissed as withdrawn with settled out of court. Refund of Court fee ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.11.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.S.No.415 of 2010
M/s.H.J.Hansen Recycling Ltd.,
Rep.by its Power of Attorney
Mr.R.Balaramesh,
Havnegade 110,
DK-5100, Odense,
Denmark. .. Plaintiff
..Vs..
M/s.A.R.S.Metals Pvt.Ltd.,
Rep.by its Managing Director
Mr.Ashwin Bhatia,
D-109, 2 nd Floor, LBR Complex,
Anna Nagar East,
Chennai 600 102. ..Defendant
Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C. read with Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules praying to pass a judgment and decree:-
2
a) directing the Defendant to pay a sum of Rs.1,14,64,358/-
(Rupees One Crore fourteen Lakhs Sixty Four Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty Eight only) as on 30.11.2009 with contracted interest at the rate of 1.5% per month from the date of Plaint till the date of payment in full
to the plaintiff and pass such further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court
may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
b)Costs of the suit.
For Plaintiff : Mr.M.S.Thanvir
for Mr.Anand Abdul and Vinodh Associates
For Defendant: Mr.T.Ramesh
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the plaintiff, by his letter dated 27.11.2017
stated that the plaintiff has instructed him to withdraw the suit.
2.Mr.M.S.Thanvir, learned representing counsel for Mr.Anand Abdul
3
and Vinodh Associates, counsel made an endorsement to that effect. It is seen from the records that the evidence in the suit has not been commenced. Hence, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn with settled out of
Court. There will be an order for refund of the entire Court fee under
Section 69 of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1955.
30.11.2017
KP
Index : Yes/ No
Internet : Yes/ No
Speaking Order/ Non-speaking Order
4
R.SUBRAMANIAN,. J.
KP
C.S.No.415 of 2010
30.11.2017
3 provisions across 3 enactments
R.SUBRAMANIAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court