S.J.Dhanaraj v. Haridoss
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition regarding a civil suit, holding that it had abated due to the death of the original petitioner with no response from legal representatives.
What did the court decide?
No costs. Dismissal of the Civil Revision Petition.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:10.10.2017
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN
CRP(NPD).No.1997 of 2003
1.S.J.Dhanaraj
.. Petitioner
vs.
1.Haridoss
2.Theagarajan
3.Saraswathi
4.Kanagam
5.Veerapandian
6.Pandian
7.Minor.Murugadoss
(Represented by Kanagam,
mother and the next friend,who
is the 4th respondent herein)
8.Chandra
9.Amudha
10.Vijayalakshmi
11.Santhi
12.Jayanthi
13.Vasantha
14.Manjula
.. Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the order dated 24.08.2001 passed in E.P.No.332 of 1997 in O.S.No.268 of 1981 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Villupuram.
For Petitioner :Mr.V.K.Elango For Respondents :Mr.R.Subramanian for R1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.J. Dhanaraj (Legal Representatives)
- respondent
Haridoss
- respondent
Theagarajan
- respondent
Saraswathi
- respondent
Kanagam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court