Disposed

Narendra Thorbadey v. R.Thangaraj

Madras HC3 Oct 2017CRP(MD)/815/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This revision petition under Article 227 sought a direction for the disposal of a pending first appeal against a dismissed suit. The High Court directed the subordinate judge to dispose of the appeal on merits within six months, citing frequent adjournments due to the court's inability to sit continuously.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Subordinate Judge to dispose of A.S.No.10 of 2009 within six months.

Narendra Thorbadey Vs R.Thangaraj — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 03.10.2017

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU

¶6

Narendra Jhorbadey : Petitioner

¶7

vs. 1.R.Thangaraj 2.M.Krishnan

¶8

3.Maruthamuthu

¶9

4.Selvam : Respondents

¶10

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying for a direction to the Subordinate Court, Palani, Camp Court, Kodaikanal to dispose of A.S.No.10 of 2009 against O.S.No.31 of 2004 in a time frame.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.J.M.Hassanul Bazari

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The above Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Subordinate Judge, Palani, Camp Court at Kodaikanal to dispose of A.S.No.10 of 2009 against O.S.No.31 of 2004 within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

¶14

The learned Counsel for the petitioner/second defendant would submit that originally the suit was numbered as O.S.No.81 of 1999 and it was transferred to the Subordinate Court, Palani for want of jurisdiction and the same was renumbered as O.S.No.31 of 2004 and the same was dismissed by the trial Court on 23.12.2008, against which the plaintiff filed an appeal in A.S.No.10 of 2009 before the lower Appellate Court and till date, the same was pending without any progress.

¶15

The learned Counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner/ second defendant is a senior citizen and he is a sickly person and therefore, he wants to see the light of his case during his life time and hence, he filed the present petition seeking for a direction to the Subordinate Judge, Palani, Camp https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court at Kodaikanal to dispose of A.S.No.10 of 2009 against O.S.No.31 of 2004 within a stipulated time.

¶16

¶17

The learned Counsel for the petitioner/second defendant would further bring to the notice of this Court that the first Appellate Court is having Camp Court at Kodaikanal and hence it is not able to sit continuously and the case was adjourned frequently and that is also the reason for the delay in proceeding the appeal. Hence, he prays for a direction for earlier disposal of the first appeal.

¶18

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

¶19

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and also taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in this Civil Revision Petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, this Court directs the Subordinate Judge, Palani, Camp Court, Kodaikanal to dispose of the first appeal in A.S.No.10 of 2009 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

With the above directions, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(Writs)

¶23

/True Copy/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

¶26

The Subordinate Court, Palani, Camp Court, Kodaikanal.

¶27

+1cc to M/S.J.M.HASSANUL BAZARI, Advocate SR.No.81503

¶28

ssl/vsg

¶29

MAS/SKN-RSK/SAR2:13.10.2017:2P-3C

¶30

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.815 of 2017 and C.M.P.(MD)No.8534 of 2017 03.10.2017

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Narendra Thorbadey v. R.Thangaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narendra Thorbadey v. R.Thangaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamban Vs S.v.S.Vijaya

National Insurance Company Vs M.Chandra

The Divisional Manager, Vs Ammiyappan

Vishnupriya, Vs Ramesh Krishnan

M.Lourdusamy Vs D.Poulraj

The Branch Manager Vs Jeyaraj